Pages

Monday, October 5, 2015

Circles within a circle

This is one simple way in which to imagine the microscopic quantum perspective. Every single quantum state is both particle and wave, but they will display which depending on current context of states. Here, some are particular as to form a circle structure. If we were to measure them, we would find there is wave-nature in these particles. If we measure the wave states that are not circle, we would find particles there. All quantum states are both particle and wave. It is the ratio P/W that differs between discrete states. 
Note that all we have here is a quantum ocean of frequencies. There is no actual "circle" there, only frequencies propagated through this ocean of single states to finally make up the apperance of circle. That is also a configuration of state frequencies. 
Also note that these states are quantum sized. A grain of salt consists of approx 1.2x10^18 single states, all of both particle and wave quality. 
So you see that having quantum rotation in numerous single states making up the distinct shape of a circle is not a problem. You will never detect the quantum "leaps" between single states. They are simply too small, too many, and will therefore appear as a distinct line/curve. 


Sunday, October 4, 2015

Quantum leaps without legs

When trying to make sense of quantum lingo, one thing is really bugging me. On the one hand, everyone agrees that quantum states are discrete and seems to flip from this to that without any continuous, seamless "going there". On the other hand, all I read about is how particles/waves are sent in directions, reflectors, detectors and whatnot. 
I do not geddit!
It's like we treat these quantum states as if they were tiny dwarfes walking the room. As if it had legs or a little propeller attached to it. 
All I can see is billions of quantum states, transfering in-formation of quanta and qualia, asking and telling "what and how much"? Knowing that, they interact and pass it on. I can't see them carry the info from here to there. Never the less, that's how most books/articles have it. 
No wonder things like entanglement and inference stays mysteries. 

Thursday, October 1, 2015

Frankly speaking

Todays feeble attempt at enforcing some light on physics was a note to Frank Wilczek. The reason he was spammed was just that there was a contact form on his site. Perhaps he will read my "whatever it is" before deleting? Probably it is in the virtual bin at "I need someone...", but I thought that plea for falsification was better than begging for confirmation. I dunno, maybe I should really make an effort to forget about the whole thing and go back to Spotify and a cool beer...
_________________________________________________________________

Dear Frank, I need someone to falsify my ideas asap, but where is that guy/gal? However I try to express them, out comes everything that is not what I mean i.e. rambling rants and crackpottery. Where can I find someone who, just to have a good laugh, would take a brief look at my wierd world? I am completely alone and it is not that fun. Trust me, I really want to be convincingly outargued so I can kill this pet theory, because it is growing into a monster. Very poetic, very "take your med's bro"-ish, I know that all too well.

I don't have the right words, I can hardly do math and therefore it comes out like:

- Wave/particle duality can be expressed as alpha stable distubution, where light appears at the crest, when p on one side and w on the other have reached max system energy and thus collapse.

- Force is angular and orbital momentum, and these two make up the duality.

- You can only measure one side (p or w) of the dual system, but the other is there until the point of measure.

- Measuring one momentum will freeze it, so naturally the other half of the interactive system goes invisible.

- Freezing orbital momentum makes angular disappear as wave. Freezing angular makes orbital a little black hole.

- When this happens, energy is gone but force conserved (as always).

- With energy gone, no wave-ness is there to make detection possible.

- Energy is caused by the above interaction between a/o momentum, and thus a variable dependent on rate/magnitude of force interaction.

- Orbital spin/momentum causes time.

- Angular spin/momentum causes space.

- etc

I won't elaborate on how I have come to these, perhaps, useful ideas. It's a zen thing. But ultimately, if I'm correct, the universe has a very bright future indeed. Evolution is geared towards wave collapses as a means for generating energy -> mass -> complexity and obviously, more force interaction. There's a guy at MIT, J. England, that is close to connecting the physic dot with the bio dot.

As for me, my network of particle dots and wave connections have me tangled up so much I'd rather be untangled and go back to "normal". I'd like someone to put the above into the existing equations and accepted frameworks. I don't think anything new has to be calculated, because I've invented nothing. I just realized that everything is indeed a matter of enforced energy, including human consciousness.

Please kill my pet.

Sorry for the rant ;)